<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ben Atkin's Weblog - Latest Comments in On finding interesting Ubiquity commands&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://benatkin.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://benatkin.disqus.com/on_finding_interesting_ubiquity_commands8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:46:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On finding interesting Ubiquity commands&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.benatkin.com/weblog/?p=95#comment-4603225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for working on this! I think that adding tags is a simple and elegant way to get 90% of the functionality that I want.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Atkin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On finding interesting Ubiquity commands&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.benatkin.com/weblog/?p=95#comment-4603224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agree with everything you say. I want to see more powerful commands too, beyond just pure search commands. Part of the solution for this is categorizing commands. Another thing we are also adding is the ability to create your own search commands using another command. This is good for the user because it is simpler to create your own searches rather than subscribing to others' search command.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>